Joint Statement:
Thank you to Liz Orman for taking notes today.
The EAC committee created a separate parent survey for current 6th grade families to gather more feedback. It will be sent out next week and the window will close on January 30th. EAC will look at trends from all of the surveys in February.
Parent/Teacher Conferences: The team brainstormed ideas to create non-negotiables.
The committee worked with random partners and shared “glows and grows” from EAC’s first trimester.
Our next meeting is February 10th.
At our February Meeting be prepared to discuss:
Increase the PR of our MTSS structures for all students and families and determine multiple ways for fidelity checks of our structures.
Increase student and community ability to articulate learning, interventions and progress
How to PR as a step prior to SPED requests from families
Review of KPASS data and determine next steps for learning structures at 4th and 5th grade.
Cross grade span and school connections (follow up from October)
Grow understanding of what IgKnight is and the types of students who thrive/struggle in a PL environment
Follow up on Preferred PD for new adoptions structures
-Data shows the following as the top date options for new adoption training:
1st priority: August/September instead of norming days
2nd priority: Stepembert subs after assessing and norming is complete
3rd priority: First contract day in August prior to Supply Drop Off
Host and optional summer date with June as the first optional date, August is
second choice
-Data shows the following as the top structure priority:
1st priority: Face to face with the company rep
2nd priority: Online training with the company rep
3rd priority: Face to face session with your Instructional Coach who has been
trained by the company rep
Questions to consider:
If we have training instead of norming, do we require teams to discuss/norm data in schools only? Or not at all?
Any further ideas or suggestions for the professional development planning team?
No comments:
Post a Comment