2018-19 SIP All In Goal Data

After three weeks of interviewing and collecting data from 1,128 students, the following is the summary of our All In SIP goals.  While the data this year leaves room for improvement, there are definitely still areas to celebrate.  Please be sure to read carefully below for the ratings, data and summary of key points.  You can revisit the presentation we shared earlier in the year with more details here if you would like.

Learner Profile Goal:

By February 2019, the overall percent of students observed at levels 2 and 3 on the learner profile rubric will increase 30% from February 2018 levels.  In February 2018, 56% of students observed were at a level 2 or 3, making the goal for 2019 to have 86% of students observed.

This year, our combined students at level 2 or 3 was 57.4% (This is an increase from fall of 27.6, but only 1.4 from a year ago at this time).

For a bit more detail, see this table with information about where our students were last February compared to this February:

Level	February 2018	February 2019
0	16%	12.4%
1	28%	30.2%
2	39%	39.9%
3	17%	17.5%

Based on the rubric we shared earlier this year, the growth we achieved this year fell in the unsatisfactory range. 

Proficiency Based Progress Goal:

By February 2019, the overall percent of students observed at levels 2 and 3 on the

proficiency based observation rubric will increase from September 2018 (15.5%) to February 2019 by a total of 60%. 

Based on the rubrics shared earlier this year, in order to reach proficiency for this goal 66% of our students surveyed in February would have needed to be in levels 2 and 3.

In February, the combined percentage of students at levels 2 or 3 was 56.9%.  Again, based on the rubrics shared earlier this year this would mean the rating for this goal is Needs Improvement.

For a bit more detail, see this table with information about where our students were in October compared to February:

The following data is current data compared to fall data (in parenthesis) of this year:

Level	October	February
0	51.8%	10.6%
1	32.7%	32.4%
2	13.1%	36.7%
3	2.4%	20.2%

Impact for evaluation:

Overall, if any staff member used both All In SIP goals, their 30% student growth rating is needs improvement for this school year.  Because of that, please see the following tables for the impact on your summative evaluation rating.  The first describes how the overall rating of Needs Improvement for the student growth component is arrived at.

To determine Student Growth Goal Rating:

	Student Growth Goal One (15%)
Student Growth Goal Two (15%)		Excellent 4	Proficient 3	Needs Improvement 2	Unsatisfactory 0
	Excellent 4	Excellent	Excellent	Proficient	Needs Improvement
	Proficient 3	Excellent	Proficient	Proficient	Needs Improvement
	Needs Improvement 2	Proficient	Proficient	Needs Improvement	Needs Improvement
	Unsatisfactory 0	Needs Improvement	Needs Improvement	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory

This means that the highest overall summative rating a teacher who used both the Learner Profile and Proficiency Based Progress goals can achieve is proficient.  Please see the chart below to see how your student growth rating and teacher performance rating interact.

To determine OVERALL SUMMATIVE RATING:

	Teacher Performance (70%)
Student Growth (30%)		Excellent 4	Proficient 3	Needs Improvement 2	Unsatisfactory 0
	Excellent 4	Excellent	Proficient	Proficient	Needs Improvement
	Proficient 3	Excellent	Proficient	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory
	Needs Improvement 2	Proficient	Proficient	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory
	Unsatisfactory 0	Proficient	Needs Improvement	Needs Improvement	Unsatisfactory

Obviously, everyone would hope we would have seen more success with these goals. However, there are definitely some areas to celebrate when looking at the data more closely.

1.     A huge reduction in the number of students that cannot identify I Can statements!  The percent shifted from 51.8% to 10.6%!  It is a celebration to consider that only 10% of our students could not identify I Can statements.

2.     We were able to maintain the level 2 and 3 students that know who they are as a learner and use that to advocate for their learning.

3.     Having 20.2% of our students able to link the feedback they are receiving to the I Can statement and know the next steps for learning, is a great celebration!

We hope everyone will take a moment to reflect on the data and consider how we could better embed the learner profile and feedback to guide proficiency into our classrooms daily.  At all levels, we will be evaluating this information and considering what the impact on our next steps as a district will be.